Guilty or Absolved (Two Righteousness’) – Luther Quote

Monument of Martin Luther. It was the first public monument of the great reformer, designed 1821 by Johann Gottfried Schadow. Martin Luther (1483 Ð 1546) was a German monk, theologian, and church reformer. He is also considered to be the founder of Protestantism. He lived and worked many years in Wittenberg. This is monument from the 19th century on the market place in Wittenberg.Martin Luther spoke to future preachers about the two kinds of righteousness’ found in the Bible. His words are worth hearing by the laity as well. Depending on one of these righteousness’ leads a person to hell. Depending on the other leads a person to heaven. Depending on one of these righteousness’ can leave a person laboring under a guilty conscience. Depending on the other leads a person to the joy of a clear conscience. In his own words, Luther said:

… and take [consciences facing temptation] from the Law to grace, from active righteousness to passive righteousness, in short, from Moses to Christ. In affliction and in the conflict of conscience it is the devil’s habit to frighten us with the Law and to set against us the consciousness of sin, our wicked past, the wrath and judgment of God, hell and eternal death, so that thus he may drive us into despair, subject us to himself, and pluck us from Christ. It is also his habit to set against us those passages in the Gospel in which Christ Himself requires works from us and with plain words threatens damnation to those who do not perform them. If here we cannot distinguish between these two kinds of righteousness, if here by faith we do not take hold of Christ, who is sitting at the right hand of God, who is our life and our righteousness, and who makes intercession for us miserable sinners before the Father (Heb. 7:25), then we are under the Law and not under grace, and Christ is no longer a Savior. Then He is a lawgiver. Then there can be no salvation left, but sure despair and eternal death will follow.

Therefore let us learn diligently this art of distinguishing between these two kinds of righteousness, in order that we may know how far we should obey the Law. We have said above that in a Christian the Law must not exceed its limits but should have its dominion only over the flesh, which is subjected to it and remains under it. When this is the case, the Law remains within its limits. But if it wants to ascend into the conscience and exert its rule there, see to it that you are a good dialectician and that you make the correct distinction. Give no more to the Law than it has coming and say to it: “Law, you want to ascend into the realm of conscience and rule there. You want to denounce its sin and take away the joy of my heart, which I have through faith in Christ. You want to plunge me into despair, in order that I may perish. You are exceeding your jurisdiction. Stay within your limits, and exercise your dominion over the flesh. You shall not touch my conscience. For I am baptized; and through the Gospel I have been called to a fellowship of righteousness and eternal life, to the kingdom of Christ, in which my conscience is at peace, where there is no Law but only the forgiveness of sins, peace, quiet, happiness, salvation, and eternal life. Do not disturb me in these matters. In my conscience not the Law will reign, that hard tyrant and cruel disciplinarian, but Christ, the Son of God, the King of peace and righteousness, the sweet Savior and Mediator. He will preserve my conscience happy and peaceful in the sound and pure doctrine of the Gospel and in the knowledge of this passive righteousness.”

Luther, Martin Luther’s Works. 26 (Lectures on Galatians 1535) 10-11

Blessing in Christ
Pastor Rickert